Skip to content

chore(deps): update oxlint to ~1.10.0 #81

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Aug 4, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
eslint-plugin-oxlint ~1.8.0 -> ~1.10.0 age confidence
oxlint (source) ~1.8.0 -> ~1.10.0 age confidence

Release Notes

oxc-project/eslint-plugin-oxlint (eslint-plugin-oxlint)

v1.10.0

Compare Source

No significant changes

    View changes on GitHub

v1.9.0

Compare Source

No significant changes

    View changes on GitHub
oxc-project/oxc (oxlint)

v1.10.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • 9b35600 linter/jsx-a11y: Add support for mapped attributes in label association checks (#​12805) (camc314)

v1.9.0

Compare Source

🚜 Refactor

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM, only on Monday ( * 0-3 * * 1 ) (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot added the dependencies label Aug 4, 2025
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update oxlint to ~1.9.0 chore(deps): update oxlint to ~1.10.0 Aug 6, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/oxlint branch from 8e7f3e4 to c20b296 Compare August 6, 2025 12:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants